New Delhi: In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi and leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), in the high-profile Delhi liquor policy case. Kejriwal had been in custody since March 21, following his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on charges of money laundering linked to the alleged scam.
Background of the Case
The Delhi liquor policy case centers around allegations that the Delhi government’s new liquor policy, implemented by Kejriwal’s administration, led to corruption and financial irregularities. The ED claimed that the policy, which aimed to liberalize the sale of liquor in the capital, facilitated kickbacks and money laundering, implicating several high-ranking officials and politicians.
Kejriwal’s arrest had sparked widespread political controversy, with AAP leaders accusing the central government of using investigative agencies to target political opponents. The opposition parties, however, demanded a thorough investigation, arguing that the allegations of corruption needed to be addressed.
Supreme Court’s Decision
In its ruling, the Supreme Court noted that while the allegations were serious, the prosecution had failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify prolonged detention. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of justice and fairness, highlighting that the accused should not be kept in custody based on mere allegations.
The bench also pointed out inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case, raising questions about the reliability of the evidence presented. As a result, the court decided to grant Kejriwal bail, stating that he should be allowed to defend himself while out of custody.
Reactions and Implications
The Supreme Court’s decision has been met with mixed reactions. AAP supporters and leaders hailed the verdict as a vindication of Kejriwal, asserting that the case was politically motivated. They expressed hope that the ruling would strengthen their fight against what they perceive as misuse of central agencies.
On the other hand, opposition leaders expressed disappointment, calling for a continued investigation into the allegations. They argued that the court’s decision should not be seen as an exoneration but rather a procedural relief, emphasizing the need for accountability in public office.
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant bail to Arvind Kejriwal in the Delhi liquor policy case marks a crucial turning point in the ongoing legal and political saga. As the case progresses, it is likely to remain a focal point of political debate and public scrutiny, underscoring the contentious nature of corruption allegations in India’s political landscape.
××××××××××××××
Telegram Link :
For latest news, first Hand written articles & trending news join Saachibaat telegram group
https://t.me/joinchat/llGA9DGZF9xmMDc1
